ModeConsentRun a Free SentinelScan
Compliance

Cookie compliance evidence for legal and technical teams

Audit and implementation support for consent systems affected by GDPR, ePrivacy, CCPA/CPRA, platform rules, and internal data governance requirements.

Implementation context

Start from observable behavior, then repair the consent contract.

Cookie compliance is not settled by banner copy. It is settled by what the browser stores, sends, and executes before and after a user makes a choice.

That means the compliance program has to reach into CMP settings, tag managers, analytics destinations, advertising pixels, regional behavior, opt-out flows, and evidence retention.

ModeConsent gives legal, marketing, analytics, and engineering teams a shared technical record of what the site actually does and what needs to change.

What breaks

The failure pattern usually starts before the dashboard can see it.

01

Policy intent does not reach the browser

Teams publish consent language while analytics, ads, and vendor scripts continue executing outside that intent.

02

Regimes are handled as copy changes

Different regions require different runtime behavior, not only different banner text.

03

Audit trails are incomplete

Without screenshots, request logs, and consent-state evidence, teams cannot defend the implementation.

04

US and EU controls are blended

Opt-in consent, opt-out rights, GPC handling, and platform consent signals can require different browser behavior that one generic banner flow does not cover.

How ModeConsent fixes it

Repair the consent system where visitors and tags actually interact.

  1. 01

    Test the technical controls

    We evaluate storage, network calls, script execution, consent defaults, and preference changes.

  2. 02

    Translate law into behavior

    Consent and opt-out requirements are mapped into CMP categories, GTM rules, and platform settings.

  3. 03

    Package evidence for review

    Findings are written for legal, analytics, marketing, and engineering stakeholders.

  4. 04

    Separate regime-specific behavior

    EU, UK, California, default-region, GPC, and platform-specific requirements are documented as runtime controls instead of copy variations.

Related work

Adjacent pages in the consent stack.

Compliance

Browser-Level Audits

Evidence-led audits that show what fires, what stores data, what changes by region, and whether consent choices are honored in production.

View pageCompliance

GDPR Cookie Compliance

Technical consent implementation for EU and UK traffic where analytics, advertising, personalization, and third-party scripts must wait for valid consent.

View pageCompliance

CCPA / CPRA Compliance

Technical review and implementation for opt-out workflows, sharing controls, sale signals, sensitive data concerns, and third-party advertising tags.

View pageCompliance

CIPA Compliance

Pixels, cookies, chat tools, session replay, and analytics can create CIPA lawsuit risk when they run before valid consent or keep running after a visitor says no.

View page
Request audit

Need evidence for the live consent stack?
Start with browser behavior.

Request Compliance Audit